IC Growth | Introducing IC Growth

Paul Green Paul Green

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer study vce & NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer latest torrent & NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer download vce

P.S. Free & New NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer dumps are available on Google Drive shared by VCEDumps: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QSGwSXHWoIJuVeP64BcHp-l5b1eqzZA3

You may feel astonished and doubtful about this figure; but we do make our NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer exam dumps well received by most customers. Better still, the 98-99% pass rate of NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer exam questions has helped most of the candidates get the certification successfully, which is far beyond that of others in this field. In recent years, supported by our professional expert team, our NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Test Braindumps have grown up and have made huge progress. You can totally rely on our NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer learning material for your future learning path.

PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Testing and monitoring of a cybersecurity program: This domain assesses the abilities of Security Auditors and Compliance Officers in testing and monitoring the effectiveness of cybersecurity programs. Candidates learn to design and conduct audits, continuous monitoring, performance measurement, and apply continual improvement practices to maintain NIS 2 Directive compliance.

Topic 2

Communication and awareness: This section covers skills of Communication Officers and Training Managers in developing and executing communication strategies and awareness programs. It emphasizes fostering cybersecurity awareness across the organization and effective internal and external communication during cybersecurity events or compliance activities.

Topic 3

Planning of NIS 2 Directive requirements implementation: This domain targets Project Managers and Implementation Specialists focusing on how to initiate and plan the rollout of NIS 2 Directive requirements. It includes using best practices and methodologies to align organizational processes and cybersecurity programs with the directive’s mandates.

>> Exam NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer PDF <<

Exam Dumps PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Pdf & NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Valid Practice Materials

The PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer (NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer) Desktop-based practice Exam is ideal for applicants who don't have access to the internet all the time. You can use this PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer (NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer) simulation software without an active internet connection. This NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer software runs only on Windows computers. Both practice tests of VCEDumps i.e. web-based and desktop are customizable, mimic PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer real exam scenarios, provide results instantly, and help to overcome mistakes.

PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer Sample Questions (Q39-Q44):

NEW QUESTION # 39
Scenario 8: FoodSafe Corporation is a well-known food manufacturing company in Vienna, Austria, which specializes in producing diverse products, from savory snacks to artisanal desserts. As the company operates in regulatory environment subject to this NIS 2 Directive, FoodSafe Corporation has employed a variety of techniques for cybersecurity testing to safeguard the integrity and security of its food production processes.
To conduct an effective vulnerability assessment process, FoodSafe Corporation utilizes a vulnerability assessment tool to discover vulnerabilities on network hosts such as servers and workstations. Additionally, FoodSafe Corporation has made a deliberate effort to define clear testing objectives and obtain top management approval during the discovery phase. This structured approach ensures that vulnerability assessments are conducted with clear objectives and that the management team is actively engaged and supports the assessment process, reinforcing the company's commitment to cybersecurity excellence.
In alignment with the NIS 2 Directive, FoodSafe Corporation has incorporated audits into its core activities, starting with an internal assessment followed by an additional audit conducted by its partners. To ensure the effectiveness of these audits, the company meticulously identified operational sectors, procedures, and policies. However, FoodSafe Corporation did not utilize an organized audit timetable as part of its internal compliance audit process. While FoodSafe's Corporation organizational chart does not clearly indicate the audit team's position, the internal audit process is well-structured. Auditors familiarize themselves with established policies and procedures to gain a comprehensive understanding of their workflow. They engage in discussions with employees further to enhance their insights, ensuring no critical details are overlooked.
Subsequently, FoodSafe Corporation's auditors generate a comprehensive report of findings, serving as the foundation for necessary changes and improvements within the company. Auditors also follow up on action plans in response to nonconformities and improvement opportunities.
The company recently expanded its offerings by adding new products and services, which had an impact on its cybersecurity program. This required the cybersecurity team to adapt and ensure that these additions were integrated securely into their existing framework. FoodSafe Corporation commitment to enhancing its monitoring and measurement processes to ensure product quality and operational efficiency. In doing so, the company carefully considers its target audience and selects suitable methods for reporting monitoring and measurement results. This incudes incorporating additional graphical elements and labeling of endpoints in their reports to provide a clearer and more intuitive representation of data, ultimately facilitating better decision-making within the organization.
According to scenario 8, internal auditors follow up on action plans in response to nonconformities or improvement opportunities. Is this in alignment with best practices?

A. Yes, the internal auditor should follow up on action plans submitted in response to nonconformities
B. Yes, the internal auditor is responsible to track the progress of action plans and make sure they are all implemented immediately
C. No, the corrections and corrective actions should be reviewed by the information security manager

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 40
Scenario 3: Founded in 2001, SafePost is a prominent postal and courier company headquartered in Brussels, Belguim. Over the years, it has become a key player in the logistics and courier in the region. With more than 500 employees, the company prides itself on its efficient and reliable services, catering to individual and corporate clients. SafePost has recognized the importance of cybersecurity in an increasingly digital world and has taken significant steps to align its operations with regulatory directives, such as the NIS 2 Directive.
SafePost recognized the importance of thoroughly analyzing market forces and opportunities to inform its cybersecurity strategy. Hence, it selected an approach that enabled the analysis of market forces and opportunities in the four following areas: political, economic, social, and technological. The results of the analysis helped SafePost in anticipating emerging threats and aligning its security measures with the evolving landscape of the postal and courier industry.
To comply with the NIS 2 Directive requirements, SafePost has implemented comprehensive cybersecurity measures and procedures, which have been documented and communicated in training sessions. However, these procedures are used only on individual initiatives and have still not been implemented throughout the company. Furthermore, SafePost's risk management team has developed and approved several cybersecurity risk management measures to help the company minimize potential risks, protect customer data, and ensure business continuity.
Additionally, SafePost has developed a cybersecurity policy that contains guidelines and procedures for safeguarding digital assets, protecting sensitive data, and defining the roles and responsibilities of employees in maintaining security. This policy will help the company by providing a structured framework for identifying and mitigating cybersecurity risks, ensuring compliance with regulations, and fostering a culture of security awareness among employees, ultimately enhancing overall cybersecurity posture and reducing the likelihood of cyber incidents.
As SafePost continues to navigate the dynamic market forces and opportunities, it remains committed to upholding the highest standards of cybersecurity to safeguard the interests of its customers and maintain its position as a trusted leader in the postal and courier industry.
Based on scenario 3, which of the following approaches was used by SafePost to analyze market forces and opportunities?

A. SWOT analysis
B. PEST analysis
C. Porter's Five Forces analysis

Answer: B

NEW QUESTION # 41
Scenario 8: FoodSafe Corporation is a well-known food manufacturing company in Vienna, Austria, which specializes in producing diverse products, from savory snacks to artisanal desserts. As the company operates in regulatory environment subject to this NIS 2 Directive, FoodSafe Corporation has employed a variety of techniques for cybersecurity testing to safeguard the integrity and security of its food production processes.
To conduct an effective vulnerability assessment process, FoodSafe Corporation utilizes a vulnerability assessment tool to discover vulnerabilities on network hosts such as servers and workstations. Additionally, FoodSafe Corporation has made a deliberate effort to define clear testing objectives and obtain top management approval during the discovery phase. This structured approach ensures that vulnerability assessments are conducted with clear objectives and that the management team is actively engaged and supports the assessment process, reinforcing the company's commitment to cybersecurity excellence.
In alignment with the NIS 2 Directive, FoodSafe Corporation has incorporated audits into its core activities, starting with an internal assessment followed by an additional audit conducted by its partners. To ensure the effectiveness of these audits, the company meticulously identified operational sectors, procedures, and policies. However, FoodSafe Corporation did not utilize an organized audit timetable as part of its internal compliance audit process. While FoodSafe's Corporation organizational chart does not clearly indicate the audit team's position, the internal audit process is well-structured. Auditors familiarize themselves with established policies and procedures to gain a comprehensive understanding of their workflow. They engage in discussions with employees further to enhance their insights, ensuring no critical details are overlooked.
Subsequently, FoodSafe Corporation's auditors generate a comprehensive report of findings, serving as the foundation for necessary changes and improvements within the company. Auditors also follow up on action plans in response to nonconformities and improvement opportunities.
The company recently expanded its offerings by adding new products and services, which had an impact on its cybersecurity program. This required the cybersecurity team to adapt and ensure that these additions were integrated securely into their existing framework. FoodSafe Corporation commitment to enhancing its monitoring and measurement processes to ensure product quality and operational efficiency. In doing so, the company carefully considers its target audience and selects suitable methods for reporting monitoring and measurement results. This incudes incorporating additional graphical elements and labeling of endpoints in their reports to provide a clearer and more intuitive representation of data, ultimately facilitating better decision-making within the organization.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following questions:
Which vulnerability assessment tool did FoodSafe Corporation use?

A. Host-based scans
B. Network-based
C. Database scans

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 42
What information does NOT have to be included in an asset inventory for effective asset management?

A. Location of asset
B. Value of assets to the organization
C. Market value of assets

Answer: C

NEW QUESTION # 43
What is the requirement for Member States regarding resources for competent authorities and single points of contact under Article 8 of the NIS 2 Directive?

A. To provide adequate resources for efficient execution of tasks and the Directive's objectives
B. To allocate resources solely for international cooperation
C. To provide unlimited resources for any related tasks

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 44
......

The PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer exam questions were developed by VCEDumps in three formats. If you take enough practice tests on NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer practice exam software by VCEDumps, you’ll be more comfortable when you walk in on PECB exam day. So, go with NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Exam Questions that are prepared under the supervision of industry experts to expand your knowledge base and successfully pass the NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer exam on the first attempt.

Exam Dumps NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Pdf: https://www.vcedumps.com/NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer-examcollection.html

BTW, DOWNLOAD part of VCEDumps NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QSGwSXHWoIJuVeP64BcHp-l5b1eqzZA3

Paul Green Paul Green

Biography

Services

Support

Company

Copywrite © ICGROWTH 2022. All right reserved